4.6 Article

Interaction among ploidy, breeding system and lineage diversification

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 224, Issue 3, Pages 1252-1265

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16184

Keywords

breeding systems; diploidization; diversification; ploidy; polyploidy; self-incompatibility; SSE models

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1655478]
  2. NSF [DEB-1655692]
  3. NESCent sabbatical scholar award [EF-0905606]
  4. Israel Science Foundation [961/17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

If particular traits consistently affect rates of speciation and extinction, broad macroevolutionary patterns can be interpreted as consequences of selection at high levels of the biological hierarchy. Identifying traits associated with diversification rates is difficult because of the wide variety of characters under consideration and the statistical challenges of testing for associations from comparative phylogenetic data. Ploidy (diploid vs polyploid states) and breeding system (self-incompatible vs self-compatible states) are both thought to be drivers of differential diversification in angiosperms. We fit 29 diversification models to extensive trait and phylogenetic data in Solanaceae and investigate how speciation and extinction rate differences are associated with ploidy, breeding system, and the interaction between these traits. We show that diversification patterns in Solanaceae are better explained by breeding system and an additional unobserved factor, rather than by ploidy. We also find that the most common evolutionary pathway to polyploidy in Solanaceae occurs via direct breakdown of self-incompatibility by whole genome duplication, rather than indirectly via breakdown followed by polyploidization. Comparing multiple stochastic diversification models that include complex trait interactions alongside hidden states enhances our understanding of the macroevolutionary patterns in plant phylogenies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available