4.8 Article

Rewiring Neuronal Glycerolipid Metabolism Determines the Extent of Axon Regeneration

Journal

NEURON
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages 276-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.009

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [AoE/M-09/12, AoE/M-604/16, C6004-17G, 16103315, 16149316, 16102519, C5031-14E]
  2. Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong SAR [ITCPD/17-9]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81671214]
  4. Shenzhen Knowledge Innovation Program [JCYJ20160428145818099, JCYJ20160427185601855]
  5. Guangdong Provincial Key ST Program [2018B030336001]
  6. Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science-Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions
  7. Nan Fung Group
  8. Wellcome Trust Seed award [108042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How adult neurons coordinate lipid metabolism to regenerate axons remains elusive. We found that depleting neuronal lipin1, a key enzyme controlling the balanced synthesis of glycerolipids through the glycerol phosphate pathway, enhanced axon regeneration after optic nerve injury. Axotomy elevated lipin1 in retinal ganglion cells, which contributed to regeneration failure in the CNS by favorably producing triglyceride (TG) storage lipids rather than phospholipid (PL) membrane lipids in neurons. Regrowth induced by lipin1 depletion required TG hydrolysis and PL synthesis. Decreasing TG synthesis by deleting neuronal diglyceride acyltransferases (DGATs) and enhancing PL synthesis through the Kennedy pathway promoted axon regeneration. In addition, peripheral neurons adopted this mechanism for their spontaneous axon regeneration. Our study reveals a critical role of lipin1 and DGATs as intrinsic regulators of glycerolipid metabolism in neurons and indicates that directing neuronal lipid synthesis away from TG synthesis and toward PL synthesis may promote axon regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available