4.5 Article

Pupillary dilation responses as a midlife indicator of risk for Alzheimer's disease: association with Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages 114-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.09.001

Keywords

Polygenic risk score; Risk indicator; Biomarker; Early identification; Locus coeruleus; Mild cognitive impairment

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01AG050595, R01AG022381, P01AG055367, R01AG059329, K08 AG047903, AG054509]
  2. Research Council of Norway [223273]
  3. Stiftelsen KG Jebsen [KL2TR00144, P50AG005131]
  4. Cooperative Studies Program of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Locus coeruleus (LC) tau accumulation begins early. Targeting LC (dys)function might improve early identification for Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. Pupillary responses during cognitive tasks are driven by the LC and index cognitive effort. Despite equivalent task performance, adults with mild cognitive impairment have greater pupil dilation/effort during digit span than cognitively normal (CN) individuals. We hypothesized that AD polygenic risk scores (AD-PRSs) would be associated with pupillary responses in middle-aged CN adults. Pupillary responses during digit span tasks were heritable (h(2) = 0.30-0.36) in 1119 men aged 56-66 years. In a CN subset-all with comparable span capacities (n = 539)-higher AD-PRSs were associated with greater pupil dilation/effort in a high (9-digit) cognitive load condition (Cohen's d = 0.36 for upper vs. lower quartile of AD-PRS distribution). Results held up after controlling for APOE genotype. Results support pupillary response-and by inference, LC dysfunction-as a genetically mediated biomarker of early mild cognitive impairment/AD risk. In combination with other biomarkers, task-evoked pupillary responses may provide additional information for early screening of genetically at-risk individuals even before cognitive declines. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available