4.7 Article

Profiling the mouse brain endothelial transcriptome in health and disease models reveals a core blood-brain barrier dysfunction module

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 1892-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0497-x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institue of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [R01 NS091281-01A1]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society Pilot Grant
  3. Takeda Pharmaceuticals New Frontier Science Program
  4. UCSF Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics NIH T32 grant [GM007546]
  5. UCSF Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care NIH T32 grant [GM008440]
  6. NIH/National Institue of Mental Health [R01 MH113896]
  7. NIH/NINDS [R01 NS050159, NS077767, R01NS055876, R01NS082280]
  8. Barrow Neurological Foundation grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blood vessels in the CNS form a specialized and critical structure, the blood-brain barrier (BBB). We present a resource to understand the molecular mechanisms that regulate BBB function in health and dysfunction during disease. Using endothelial cell enrichment and RNA sequencing, we analyzed the gene expression of endothelial cells in mice, comparing brain endothelial cells with peripheral endothelial cells. We also assessed the regulation of CNS endothelial gene expression in models of stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury and seizure, each having profound BBB disruption. We found that although each is caused by a distinct trigger, they exhibit strikingly similar endothelial gene expression changes during BBB disruption, comprising a core BBB dysfunction module that shifts the CNS endothelial cells into a peripheral endothelial cell-like state. The identification of a common pathway for BBB dysfunction suggests that targeting therapeutic agents to limit it may be effective across multiple neurological disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available