4.8 Article

Pan-viral serology implicates enteroviruses in acute flaccid myelitis

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 1748-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0613-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society-American Brain Foundation [FAN-1608-25607]
  2. UCSF Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program
  3. American Academy of Neurology [P0534134]
  4. University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Dean's Office Medical Student Research Program
  5. UCSF Bioinformatics Graduate Program
  6. NIH [K08NS096117, K23AI28069]
  7. Chan Zuckerberg Biohub
  8. Rachleff family
  9. Sandler Foundation
  10. William K. Bowes, Jr. Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since 2012, the United States of America has experienced a biennial spike in pediatric acute flaccid myelitis (AFM)(1-6). Epidemiologic evidence suggests non-polio enteroviruses (EVs) are a potential etiology, yet EV RNA is rarely detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)(2). CSF from children with AFM (n = 42) and other pediatric neurologic disease controls (n = 58) were investigated for intrathecal antiviral antibodies, using a phage display library expressing 481,966 overlapping peptides derived from all known vertebrate and arboviruses (VirScan). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of AFM CSF RNA (n = 20 cases) was also performed, both unbiased sequencing and with targeted enrichment for EVs. Using VirScan, the viral family significantly enriched by the CSF of AFM cases relative to controls was Picornaviridae, with the most enriched Picornaviridae peptides belonging to the genus Enterovirus (n = 29/42 cases versus 4/58 controls). EV VP1 ELISA confirmed this finding (n = 22/26 cases versus 7/50 controls). mNGS did not detect additional EV RNA. Despite rare detection of EV RNA, pan-viral serology frequently identified high levels of CSF EV-specific antibodies in AFM compared with controls, providing further evidence for a causal role of non-polio EVs in AFM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available