4.5 Article

Cost-effective production of cellulose hydrolysing enzymes from Trichoderma sp RCK65 under SSF and its evaluation in saccharification of cellulosic substrates

Journal

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 39, Issue 11, Pages 1659-1670

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-016-1641-6

Keywords

Lignocellulosic substrate; Cellulase; Solid state fermentation; Trichoderma sp RCK65; Cost analysis

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India [40-133/2011 (SR)]
  2. Department of Science and Technology [SERB/FT/LS-229/2012]
  3. University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
  4. Central University of Haryana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trichoderma sp. is a potential cellulase producing mesophilic fungi which grow under mild acidic condition. In this study, growth and nutritional conditions were manipulated for the maximum and cost-effective production of cellulase using lab strain Trichoderma sp. RCK65 and checked for its efficiency in hydrolysis of Prosopis juliflora (a woody substrate). Preliminary studies suggested that when 48 h old secondary fungal culture (20 % v/w) was inoculated in wheat bran moistened with mineral salt solution (pH 4.5 and 1:3 solid to moisture ratio), incubated at 30 A degrees C and after 72 h, it produced maximum cellulase (CMCase 145 U/gds, FPase 38 U/gds and beta-glucosidase 105 U/gds). However, using statistical approach a S:L ratio (1:1) was surprisingly found to be optimum that improved cellulase that is CMCase activity by 6.21 %, FPase activity by 23.68 % and beta-glucosidase activity by 37.28 %. The estimated cost of crude enzyme (Rs. 5.311/1000 FPase units) seems to be economically feasible which may be due to high enzyme titre, less cultivation time and low media cost. Moreover, when the crude enzyme was used to saccharify pretreated Prosopis juliflora (a woody substrate), it resulted up to 83 % (w/w) saccharification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available