4.8 Article

Diurnal oscillations of endogenous H2O2 sustained by p66Shc regulate circadian clocks

Journal

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 1553-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-019-0420-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [CIFMS2017-I2M-1-008, 2019-RC-HL-006, 2016-I2M-1-015, 2016-I2M-1-011]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91849207, 81701387, 91639304, 31471126, 31571193]
  3. Medical Epigenetics Research Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2017PT31035, 2018PT31015]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017T100051]
  5. Youth Top-notch Talent Support Program
  6. Youth Yangtze River Scholar Program in China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Redox balance, an essential feature of healthy physiological steady states, is regulated by circadian clocks, but whether or how endogenous redox signalling conversely regulates clockworks in mammals remains unknown. Here, we report circadian rhythms in the levels of endogenous H2O2 in mammalian cells and mouse livers. Using an unbiased method to screen for H2O2 sensitive transcription factors, we discovered that rhythmic redox control of CLOCK directly by endogenous H2O2 oscillations is required for proper intracellular clock function. Importantly, perturbations in the rhythm of H2O2 levels induced by the loss of p66(Shc), which oscillates rhythmically in the liver and suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of mice, disturb the rhythmic redox control of CLOCK function, reprogram hepatic transcriptome oscillations, lengthen the circadian period in mice and modulate light-induced clock resetting. Our findings suggest that redox signalling rhythms are intrinsically coupled to the circadian system through reversible oxidative modification of CLOCK and constitute essential mechanistic timekeeping components in mammals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available