4.8 Article

Persistent and polarized global actin flow is essential for directionality during cell migration

Journal

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 1370-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-019-0411-5

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [681808]
  2. Wellcome Trust [107859/Z/15/Z]
  3. BBSRC London Interdisciplinary Doctoral Programme
  4. BBSRC [BB/N00065X/1]
  5. Wellcome Trust [107859/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. BBSRC [BB/N00065X/1, BB/F020635/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. EPSRC [EP/K038656/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [MR/K017047/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [681808] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell migration is hypothesized to involve a cycle of behaviours beginning with leading edge extension. However, recent evidence suggests that the leading edge may be dispensable for migration, raising the question of what actually controls cell directionality. Here, we exploit the embryonic migration of Drosophila macrophages to bridge the different temporal scales of the behaviours controlling motility. This approach reveals that edge fluctuations during random motility are not persistent and are weakly correlated with motion. In contrast, flow of the actin network behind the leading edge is highly persistent. Quantification of actin flow structure during migration reveals a stable organization and asymmetry in the cell-wide flowfield that strongly correlates with cell directionality. This organization is regulated by a gradient of actin network compression and destruction, which is controlled by myosin contraction and cofilin-mediated disassembly. It is this stable actin-flow polarity, which integrates rapid fluctuations of the leading edge, that controls inherent cellular persistence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available