4.8 Article

A wide star-black-hole binary system from radial-velocity measurements

Journal

NATURE
Volume 575, Issue 7784, Pages 618-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1766-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11988101/11425313, 11773015/11333004/U1838201, 11603010, 11690024, U1531118, 11603035, 11733009, 11325313/11633002]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China (NKRDPC) [2019YFA0405504, 2016YFA0400804, 2016YFA0400803, 2016YFA0400704]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AYA2017-83216-P]
  4. Polish National Science Center (NCN) [2015/19/B/ST9/01099, 2018/30/A/ST9/00050]
  5. National Development and Reform Commission
  6. W.M. Keck Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All stellar-mass black holes have hitherto been identified by X-rays emitted from gas that is accreting onto the black hole from a companion star. These systems are all binaries with a black-hole mass that is less than 30 times that of the Sun(1-4). Theory predicts, however, that X-ray-emitting systems form a minority of the total population of star-black-hole binaries(5,6). When the black hole is not accreting gas, it can be found through radial-velocity measurements of the motion of the companion star. Here we report radial-velocity measurements taken over two years of the Galactic B-type star, LB-1. We find that the motion of the B star and an accompanying Ha emission line require the presence of a dark companion with a mass of 68(+11)(-13) solar masses, which can only be a black hole. The long orbital period of 78.9 days shows that this is a wide binary system. Gravitational-wave experiments have detected black holes of similar mass, but the formation of such massive ones in a high-metallicity environment would be extremely challenging within current stellar evolution theories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available