4.8 Article

Decoding human fetal liver haematopoiesis

Journal

NATURE
Volume 574, Issue 7778, Pages 365-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1652-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Human Cell Atlas Strategic Science Support [WT211276/Z/18/Z]
  2. Wellcome [WT107931/Z/15/Z, WT206194, WT110104/Z/15/Z]
  3. Lister Institute for Preventive Medicine
  4. NIHR
  5. Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre
  6. ERC Consolidator award
  7. EU MRG-Grammar award
  8. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  9. Royal Society Fellowship
  10. European Haematology Association
  11. Wellcome
  12. MRC
  13. Manton Foundation
  14. Klarman Cell Observatory
  15. BBSRC [BB/P002293/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  16. MRC [MC_PC_16040, MR/R006237/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Definitive haematopoiesis in the fetal liver supports self-renewal and differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells and multipotent progenitors (HSC/MPPs) but remains poorly defined in humans. Here, using single-cell transcriptome profiling of approximately 140,000 liver and 74,000 skin, kidney and yolk sac cells, we identify the repertoire of human blood and immune cells during development. We infer differentiation trajectories from HSC/MPPs and evaluate the influence of the tissue microenvironment on blood and immune cell development. We reveal physiological erythropoiesis in fetal skin and the presence of mast cells, natural killer and innate lymphoid cell precursors in the yolk sac. We demonstrate a shift in the haemopoietic composition of fetal liver during gestation away from being predominantly erythroid, accompanied by a parallel change in differentiation potential of HSC/MPPs, which we functionally validate. Our integrated map of fetal liver haematopoiesis provides a blueprint for the study of paediatric blood and immune disorders, and a reference for harnessing the therapeutic potential of HSC/MPPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available