4.7 Article

Cosmic rays or turbulence can suppress cooling flows (where thermal heating or momentum injection fail)

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 491, Issue 1, Pages 1190-1212

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3011

Keywords

MHD; turbulence; methods: numerical; cosmic rays; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

Funding

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  2. NASA ATP Grant [NNX14AH35G]
  3. NSF Collaborative Research Grant [1411920]
  4. CAREER grant [1455342]
  5. Simons Foundation
  6. NSF [AST-1517491, AST-1715216, AST-1715101, AST-1412153]
  7. CAREER award [AST-1652522]
  8. NASA [17-ATP17-0067]
  9. CXO [TM7-18007]
  10. Cottrell Scholar Award from the Research Corporation for Science Advancement
  11. UC-MEXUS
  12. CONACyT
  13. NASA HEC [SMD-167592]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quenching 'maintenance' and 'cooling flow' problems are important from the Milky Way through massive cluster elliptical galaxies. Previous work has shown that some source of energy beyond that from stars and pure magnetohydrodynamic processes is required, perhaps from active galactic nuclei, but even the qualitative form of this energetic input remains uncertain. Different scenarios include thermal 'heating', direct wind or momentum injection, cosmic ray heating or pressure support, or turbulent 'stirring' of the intracluster medium (ICM). We investigate these in 10(12)-10(14) M-circle dot haloes using high-resolution non-cosmological simulations with the FIRE-2 (Feedback In Realistic Environments) stellar feedback model, including simplified toy energy injection models, where we arbitrarily vary the strength, injection scale, and physical form of the energy. We explore which scenarios can quench without violating observational constraints on energetics or ICM gas. We show that turbulent stirring in the central similar to 100 kpc, or cosmic ray injection, can both maintain a stable low-star formation rate halo for >Gyr time-scales with modest energy input, by providing a non-thermal pressure that stably lowers the core density and cooling rates. In both cases, associated thermal-heating processes are negligible. Turbulent stirring preserves cool-core features while mixing condensed core gas into the hotter halo and is by far the most energy efficient model. Pure thermal heating or nuclear isotropic momentum injection require vastly larger energy, are less efficient in lower mass haloes, easily overheat cores, and require fine tuning to avoid driving unphysical temperature gradients or gas expulsion from the halo centre.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available