4.5 Article

The UDP-GalNAcA biosynthesis genes gna-gne2 are required to maintain cell envelope integrity and in vivo fitness in multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Journal

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 153-172

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14407

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Public Health Service Grant from the National Institutes of Health [AI107184]
  3. University of Michigan Medical School Host Microbiome Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acinetobacter baumannii infects a wide range of anatomic sites including the respiratory tract and bloodstream. Despite its clinical importance, little is known about the molecular basis of A. baumannii pathogenesis. We previously identified the UDP-N-acetyl-d-galactosaminuronic acid (UDP-GalNAcA) biosynthesis genes, gna-gne2, as being critical for survival in vivo. Herein, we demonstrate that Gna-Gne2 are part of a complex network connecting in vivo fitness, cell envelope homeostasis and resistance to antibiotics. The increment gna-gne2 mutant exhibits a severe fitness defect during bloodstream infection. Capsule production is abolished in the mutant strain, which is concomitant with its inability to survive in human serum. In addition, the increment gna-gne2 mutant was more susceptible to vancomycin and unable to grow on MacConkey plates, indicating an alteration in cell envelope integrity. Analysis of lipid A by mass spectrometry showed that the hexa- and hepta-acylated species were affected in the gna-gne2 mutant. Finally, the increment gna-gne2 mutant was more susceptible to several classes of antibiotics. Together, this study demonstrates the importance of UDP-GalNAcA in the pathobiology of A. baumannii. By interrupting its biosynthesis, we showed that this molecule plays a critical role in capsule biosynthesis and maintaining the cell envelope homeostasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available