4.2 Article

Prevalence and molecular characterization of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in hospital soil and dust of a developing country, Iran

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
Volume 165, Issue 12, Pages 1306-1314

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000857

Keywords

non-tuberculous mycobacteria; hospital infection; 16SrRNA sequencing

Categories

Funding

  1. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences [393420]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence and diversity of mycobacteria that are capable of survival in a harsh and adverse condition, such as hospital environments, have not been comprehensively studied. This study aimed to assess the frequency and diversity of mycobacteria in hospital soil and dust of a developing country using a combination of molecular and conventional methods. A total of 318 hospital dust and soil samples collected from 38 hospitals were analysed using standard protocols for characterization of mycobacteria. The conventional tests were used for preliminary identification and Runyon's classification, the PCR amplification of the hsp65 gene and sequence analyses of 16SrRNA were applied for genus and species identification. In total, 28 samples (8.8%) were positive for mycobacteria. The isolates included 33 mycobacteria species including 19 rapidly growing and 14 slowly growing organisms. The most prevalent species were M. setense and M. lentiflavum, five isolates (15.1%) each, M. fortuitum, four isolates (12.12%) and M. kumamotonense and M. massiliense/abscessus complex three isolates (9.1%) each, M. arupense and M. frederiksbergense, two isolates (6%) each. The remaining isolates consisted the single strains of eight various mycobacterium species, the results of our study revealed that soil and dust in hospitals can be the reservoir of mycobacteria. This reaffirms the fact that these organisms due to intrinsic resistance can persist in hospitals and create a threat to patient's health, in particular to those who suffer from weakness of immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available