4.7 Article

Identifying pneumonia in chest X-rays: A deep learning approach

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages 511-518

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.076

Keywords

Chest X-ray; Medical imaging; Object detection; Segmentation

Funding

  1. European Union [721321]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation [2.7905.2017/8.9]
  3. FCT -Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UID/EEA/50008/2019]
  4. RNP
  5. MCTIC under the Centro de Referencia em Radiocomunicacoes -CRR project of the Instituto Nacional de Telecomunicacoes (Inatel), Brazil [01250.075413/2018-04]
  6. Brazilian National Council for Research and Development (CNPq) [309335/2017-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rich collection of annotated datasets piloted the robustness of deep learning techniques to effectuate the implementation of diverse medical imaging tasks. Over 15% of deaths include children under age five are caused by pneumonia globally. In this study, we describe our deep learning based approach for the identification and localization of pneumonia in Chest X-rays (CXRs) images. Researchers usually employ CXRs for the diagnostic imaging study. Several factors such as positioning of the patient and depth of inspiration can change the appearance of the chest X-ray, complicating interpretation further. Our identification model (https://github.com/amitkumarj441/identify_pneumonia) is based on Mask-RCNN, a deep neural network which incorporates global and local features for pixel-wise segmentation. Our approach achieves robustness through critical modifications of the training process and a novel post-processing step which merges bounding boxes from multiple models. The proposed identification model achieves better performances evaluated on chest radiograph dataset which depict potential pneumonia causes. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available