4.7 Article

Precipitation behavior in an Al-Cu-Mg-Si alloy during ageing

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138369

Keywords

Aluminium alloys; Characterization; Electron microscopy; Phase transformations; Hardness; Modeling/simulations

Funding

  1. Faculty of Natural Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology [NTNU] [81617879]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.584.21.0023, RFMEFI58417X0023]
  3. NORTEM infrastructure at NTNU, Trondheim, Norway [197405]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The precipitation behavior and aging response of an A1-4.9Cu-0.74Mg-0.51Si-0.48Mn-0.1Cr-0.08Ti-0.02Fe (wt. %) alloy was examined in detail after aging at 170 degrees C with different dwell times up to 96 h. Deformation by 3% stretching prior to aging was used to investigate the effect of dislocations on phase and hardness evolution and compared with the undeformed material. The small pre-deformation led to a slight decrease of peak strength due to reduced homogenous nucleation. Strong interaction between different phases caused the formation of hybrid structures both in the undeformed bulk areas and on dislocations. These phases consist of different fragments of the GP zones, 8 ''- and Er-phases from the Al-Cu system, GPB zones and Sl-phase from the Al-Cu-Mg system, and beta ''-, beta'-Cu, C- and Q'-phases from the Al-Mg-Si-Cu system. A new phase named C1, isostructural to the C-phase but having a different orientation with the Al matrix - (010)(c)//(010)(Al), [001](c)//[101](Al), has been found predominantly on dislocation lines, and to a lesser extent in hybrid precipitates in the bulk. Calculations of structural stability by density functional theory (DFT) were performed on experimentally found structures, consisting of a C-phase core in two different orientations, and having Cu segregations in GP-like structures at their interfaces with the matrix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available