4.3 Article

Using pre- and postexploitation samples to assess the impact of commercial whaling on the genetic characteristics of eastern North Pacific gray and humpback whales and to compare methods used to infer historic demography

Journal

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 398-420

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12652

Keywords

bottleneck; DNA; genetic diversity; gray whale; humpback whale; whaling

Funding

  1. Clayoquot Biosphere Trust
  2. Jamie's Whaling Station
  3. Remote Passages Marine Excursions
  4. Saint Mary's University Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many species of whales went through recent bottlenecks due to commercial whaling. These declines were rapid and recent relative to the life spans and generation times of these species, raising questions regarding to what degree commercial whaling influenced the genetic characteristics of these populations. We analyzed mitochondrial and nuclear DNA from pre- and postwhaling samples from two populations that have arguably shown the greatest degree of recovery: eastern North Pacific gray and humpback whales. We also compare the performance of different methods to test for historic bottlenecks and infer past demography based on genetic data. We found substantially higher levels of genetic diversity in gray than in humpback whales (for both time periods), likely due to recent connectivity between Atlantic and Pacific gray whale populations. Other than mitochondrial diversity in humpback whales, levels of diversity were not lower in contemporary samples relative to prewhaling samples, indicating that commercial whaling had a minimal impact on metrics of genetic diversity themselves. However, it did have large impacts on the patterns of diversity, as evidenced by all coalescent-based methods showing clear evidence of a bottleneck for both populations, whereas all but one method not based on the coalescent failed to detect a bottleneck.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available