4.2 Review

Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal T1 and T2 mapping MRI

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-019-00797-5

Keywords

Kidney; T1 relaxation; T2 relaxation; MRI; Biomarkers; Standardization; Consensus

Funding

  1. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA 16103]
  2. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [115974]
  3. NIH NIDDK individual fellowship [1F32DK109591]
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/R02264X/1]
  5. University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
  6. NIDDK [R01 DK093793, R01 DK106557]
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [KLI 736-B30]
  8. cardiovascular imaging group (CVIG), Leiden, The Netherlands
  9. MRC [MR/R02264X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [MR/R02264X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To develop technical recommendations on the acquisition and post-processing of renal longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation time mapping. A multidisciplinary panel consisting of 18 experts in the field of renal T1 and T2 mapping participated in a consensus project, which was initiated by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA CA16103. Consensus recommendations were formulated using a two-step modified Delphi method. The first survey consisted of 56 items on T1 mapping, of which 4 reached the pre-defined consensus threshold of 75% or higher. The second survey was expanded to include both T1 and T2 mapping, and consisted of 54 items of which 32 reached consensus. Recommendations based were formulated on hardware, patient preparation, acquisition, analysis and reporting. Consensus-based technical recommendations for renal T1 and T2 mapping were formulated. However, there was considerable lack of consensus for renal T1 and particularly renal T2 mapping, to some extent surprising considering the long history of relaxometry in MRI, highlighting key knowledge gaps that require further work. This paper should be regarded as a first step in a long-term evidence-based iterative process towards ever increasing harmonization of scan protocols across sites, to ultimately facilitate clinical implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available