4.7 Article

Global sensitivity analysis of the hydraulic parameters of the reservoir colluvial landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 483-494

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01290-9

Keywords

Global sensitivity analysis; Reservoir colluvial landslide; Hydraulic parameters; PAWN; Three Gorges Reservoir area

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1501305]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41702328]
  3. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019CFB585]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [CUGL170813, CUGQYZX1747]
  5. Xi'an Center of Geological Survey, China Geological Survey [DD20190714]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydraulic parameters are key data for calculating groundwater level, which is critical for assessing reservoir landslide stability. However, the quantitative understanding the influence of hydraulic parameters on the groundwater level of a reservoir landslide remains limited. In this paper, we apply a novel global sensitivity analysis method, PAWN, to quantify the sensitivity of hydraulic properties. The Shuping landslide, which is a typical reservoir colluvial landslide located in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China, is used as a study case. The hydraulic parameters are first sampled within their entire feasibility space by the Latin hypercube sampling method. These samples are then used as inputs into a nonintrusive finite element program to automatically compute the corresponding groundwater level outputs. Finally, sensitivity indices are calculated based on the input-output dataset via the PAWN method. The global sensitivity analysis results provide useful guidelines for site investigation and reservoir colluvial landslide model simplification and calibration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available