4.7 Article

Multi-graph fusion for multi-view spectral clustering

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105102

Keywords

Multi-view learning; Spectral clustering; Graph fusion

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61806045, 61572111, 61972072, 61772115]
  2. Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities of China [ZYGX2017KYQD177, A03017023701012]
  3. 985 Project of UESTC, China [A1098531023601041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A panoply of multi-view clustering algorithms has been developed to deal with prevalent multi-view data. Among them, spectral clustering-based methods have drawn much attention and demonstrated promising results recently. Despite progress, there are still two fundamental questions that stay unanswered to date. First, how to fuse different views into one graph. More often than not, the similarities between samples may be manifested differently by different views. Many existing algorithms either simply take the average of multiple views or just learn a common graph. These simple approaches fail to consider the flexible local manifold structures of all views. Hence, the rich heterogeneous information is not fully exploited. Second, how to learn the explicit cluster structure. Most existing methods do not pay attention to the quality of the graphs and perform graph learning and spectral clustering separately. Those unreliable graphs might lead to suboptimal clustering results. To fill these gaps, in this paper, we propose a novel multi-view spectral clustering model which performs graph fusion and spectral clustering simultaneously. The fusion graph approximates the original graph of each individual view but maintains an explicit cluster structure. Experiments on four widely used data sets confirm the superiority of the proposed method. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available