4.3 Article

Breathiness and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) in Patients Undergoing Medialization Laryngoplasty With or Without Arytenoid Adduction

Journal

JOURNAL OF VOICE
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 312-316

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.016

Keywords

Consensus perceptual-auditory evaluation of voice (CAPE-V); Medialization laryngoplasty; Arytenoid adduction; Normalized glottal gap area; Type I thyroplasty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis, those who underwent medialization laryngoplasty with arytenoid adduction had significantly higher preoperative breathiness perception compared to those who had only medialization laryngoplasty. Postoperatively, the former group showed improvements in breathiness, loudness, strain, and pitch, while the latter group showed greater improvement in roughness. Surgeons may consider auditory perceptual evaluation of voice when deciding on arytenoid adduction surgery for UVFP patients.
Objectives. We hypothesized that, in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP), the auditory-perception of breathiness measured with Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPEV) would be higher preoperatively in patients who undergo medialization laryngoplasty (ML) with arytenoid adduction (AA) compared to ML alone. We further hypothesized that increased breathiness would correlate with increased glottal area at maximum glottal closure. Study Design. Retrospective chart review. Methods. CAPE-V recordings were rated by expert judges in 105 subjects with UVFP (47 ML+AA and 58 ML). Component scores of the CAPE-V prior to laryngeal framework surgery and those at 3 and/or 12 months postoperatively were compared. Assessment of glottal area width during maximum glottal closure was attempted. Results. Breathiness scores prior to laryngeal framework surgery were significantly greater in UVFP patients having ML+AA compared to ML only (P < 0.001). Roughness was greater for ML only (P = 0.003). At 3 months, adjusted for age and previous injection laryngoplasty, the ML+AA group showed greater improvement for breathiness (P < 0.001), loudness (P < 0.001), strain (P = 0.037), and pitch (P = 0.039), while the ML only group showed greater improvement in roughness (P = 0.009). Results were similar at 12 months. Only 26% of glottal area widths were ratable using methods previously described; therefore, no further analysis was attempted. Conclusions. In patients with UVFP baseline perception of breathiness is greater in those clinically selected for ML+AA compared to ML only. Glottal area measurements were not representative of the UVFP cohort and more stringent criteria are needed for valid and reliable glottal area assessment when using clinical flexible stroboscopic exams. Findings support the idea that surgeons may be making decisions about AA based, to at least some degree, on auditory perceptual evaluation of voice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available