Journal
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 14-25Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12822
Keywords
alpine plants; Alps; climate change effects; cover; GLORIA (Global Observation Research Initiative in Alpine Environments); High Tatras; long-term monitoring; observer error; species composition; species turnover; thermic vegetation indicator
Categories
Funding
- MAVA foundation for Nature Conservation (project GLORIA - Climate change impacts in protected areas of the Alps and high mountains of Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean region)
- Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic
- Slovak Academy of Sciences [2/0132/18]
- Austrian Climate Research Programme [ACRP 6: GZ B368633, KR13AC6K11076]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Questions: Long-term programs monitoring the impact of climate change on alpine vegetation necessarily involve changing observers. We aim at quantifying observer errors and ask if the signal of alpine vegetation transformation due to climate change exceeds pseudo-changes caused by observer errors. Location: Two mountain regions in the Alps, Schrankogel and Hochschwab (both Austria), and one in the High Tatra Mountains (Slovakia). Methods: Vascular plant species presence and cover were recorded on 10-12 1-m(2) plots by 13-14 observers per site. Observer errors were calculated as species turnover, and deviations of species cover and the plot thermic vegetation indicator (which is correlated with temperature) from the mean over all observers. Observer errors in estimating species cover were split into a random and systematic part. The influence of plot and species characteristics on observer errors was investigated using (generalized) linear mixed-effect models. Changes over time from three surveys in species turnover, cover and the thermic vegetation indicator were related to the amount of observer error using a bootstrap approach. Results: Species cover was the most influential factor affecting observer errors in recording species lists and in species cover estimation. Plot attributes and observer identity had a weak but significant influence on errors in the thermic vegetation indicator. Systematic errors in estimating species cover were <= 5%. Changes over time in estimating species cover, as well as in species turnover and the thermic vegetation indicator exceeded observer errors in all cases where the observation period was >= 10 years. Conclusions: The thermic vegetation indicator, which combines species composition and cover with species' elevational distributions, provides a reliable estimate of warming-related vegetation changes. Our results underline the importance of long-term monitoring and long observation periods, which enable us to account for short-term fluctuations and observer errors alike.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available