4.7 Article

Early fatigue in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: an insight from clinical practice

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-02132-x

Keywords

Fatigue; Cancer; Immune-related adverse events; IL-6; PD-1; PD-L1 inhibitors; Immunotherapy

Funding

  1. Fondazione Melanoma Onlus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Fatigue was reported as the most common any-grade adverse event (18.3%), and the most common grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse event (irAE) (0.89%) in patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trial. Methods The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the correlations between early ir-fatigue, delayed ir-fatigue, and clinical outcomes in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in clinical practice. Results 517 patients were evaluated. After the 12-weeks landmark selection, 386 (74.7%) patients were eligible for the clinical outcomes analysis. 40.4% were NSCLC, 42.2% were melanoma, 15.3% renal cell carcinoma and 2.1% other malignancies. 76 patients (19.7%) experienced early ir-fatigue (within 1 month from treatment commencement), while 150 patients (38.9%) experienced delayed ir-fatigue. Early ir-fatigue was significantly related to shortened PFS (HR=2.29 [95% CI 1.62-3.22], p<0.0001) and OS (HR=2.32 [95% CI 1.59-3.38], p<0.0001) at the multivariate analysis. On the other hand, we found a significant association between the occurrence of early ir-fatigue, ECOG-PS >= 2 (p<0.0001), and disease burden (p=0.0003). Delayed ir-fatigue was not significantly related to PFS nor OS. Conclusions Early ir-fatigue seems to be negative prognostic parameter, but to proper weight its role we must to consider the predominant role of performance status, which was related to early ir-fatigue in the study population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available