4.2 Article

Influence of microcystins-LR (MC-LR) on autophagy in human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2019.1699732

Keywords

MC-LR; autophagy flux; nerve cell; LC3

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81773393, 81502787]
  2. Central South University Innovation Driven Project [20170027010004]
  3. Key Research and Development Projects in Hunan Province [2019SK2041]
  4. National Science and Technology Basic Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015FY111100, 2016YFC0900802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microcystin-LR (MC-LR) variant exposure poses a potential health hazard to ecosystem, animals, and humans. Previously investigators showed that autophagy plays a key role in MC-LR induced cytotoxicity immortalized murine ovarian granular KK-1 cells and rat Sertoli cells. Recently exposure to MC-LR via drinking water was reported to accumulate in mouse brain with associated adverse oxidant and inflammatory responses. However, autophagy the physiological mechanism required for cells to degrade their own impaired organelles to maintain their homeostasis has not been determined with respect to MC-LR actions on the central nervous system (CNS). Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of MC-LR on autophagy using human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells as CNS model. Data demonstrated that after treatment with 15 or 30 mu mol/L MC-LR for 48 hr significantly reduced survival rate was noted in SK-N-SH cells. MC-LR increased the expression levels of autophagy-related proteins light chain 3 (LC3) II/I and p62 in SK-N-SH cells, resulting in the accumulation of LC3 and increased intracellular free calcium ion levels. Data indicated that MC-LR induced adverse effects on the CNS as evidenced by decreased cellular survival associated with inhibition of autophagy flux and consequent enhanced autophagosomes accumulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available