4.6 Article

Interobserver Reliability of Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Scoring Using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay in NSCLC

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 550-555

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.11.010

Keywords

Assay reliability; Immunohistochemistry; Interobserver concordance; Programmed cell death ligand-1; SP263

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay is approved for use with anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) therapies in NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma. Here, we investigate interobserver reliability of the SP263 assay, applied to PD-L1 scoring of tumor cells (TCs) in NSCLC. Methods: Six practicing European pulmonary pathologists independently scored the proportion of TCs expressing PD-L1 (TC score) from 200 archival, commercially sourced, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NSCLC resections stained using the SP263 assay. Agreement in scores was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and concordance in patient's classification using Fleiss' kappa. Results: Results from 172 samples showed strong pair-wise correlations between pathologists (R-2 > 0.89) for TC scoring with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96. Overall agreement was greater than 90% for TC of 1% and above, and greater than 94% for TCs of at least 25% and at least 50%. Fleiss' kappa showed substantial agreement for TC of 1% and above, and almost perfect agreement for TCs of at least 25% and at least 50%. Conclusions: Assessment of TC score in NSCLC was highly reproducible using the SP263 assay, building confidence in the accuracy of this assay in selection of patients for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. (C) 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available