4.4 Article

Effect of Substrate Surface Roughness on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cold-Sprayed Ti6Al4V Coatings on Ti6Al4V Substrates

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 1959-1973

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11666-019-00926-5

Keywords

finite element analysis; high-pressure cold spray; mechanical properties; substrate surface condition; Ti6Al4V powder/coating/substrate

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  2. Rolls-Royce (RR)
  3. Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface condition, especially surface roughness of substrates, critically influences the adhesion of cold-sprayed titanium alloy coatings. To study this, Ti6Al4V (Ti64) coatings were deposited on Ti64 substrates with increasing surface roughness (R-a) from 0.05 mu m (polished surface) to 5.4 mu m (water-jet cut surface). It was found that the substrate surface roughness did not significantly affect the porosity, hardness and coating surface roughness because these properties were dependent on the deposition parameters such as propellant gas pressure and temperature and nozzle traverse speed. The adhesion test results showed that smoother substrate surfaces improved the coating bond strength of the cold-sprayed Ti64 coatings from about 7.1 MPa (R-a: 5.4 mu m, interface failure) to 68.7 MPa (R-a: 0.05 mu m, glue failure). The fracture characteristics of the debonded coating/substrate interfaces revealed that there were more adiabatic shear-induced craters observed on the smoother substrate surfaces. Finite element modeling also showed that the substrate surface features (i.e., peaks and valleys) possibly prevented the intimate contact between the particles and substrate and thus induced the non-uniform distributions of temperature, stress and strain at the particle/substrate interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available