4.3 Article

Comparing Support Vector Machines and Maximum Likelihood Classifiers for Mapping of Urbanization

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-019-01056-9

Keywords

Accuracy assessment; Support vector machine; Maximum likelihood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Remote sensing of environmental processes and properties using Landsat imagery has evolved since its inception in 1972. Monitoring of land cover and its changes over space and time using classification algorithms is one of the most important uses of remote sensing. However, the reliability of the land cover products from remotely sensed data is dependent upon the accuracy of different classification parameters. In this study, we have applied and tested two land cover classification algorithms: support vector machine (SVM) and maximum likelihood (ML) for land cover classification of the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, between 1988 and 2016. The results show that SVM has better classification accuracies compared to ML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available