4.7 Article

ACC/AHA/HRS Versus ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope JACC Guideline Comparison

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 19, Pages 2410-2423

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.012

Keywords

bifascicular block; clinical practice guidelines; electrophysiological study; implantable loop recorder; orthostatic hypotension; permanent pacemaker; reflex syncope; syncope

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Syncope is a commonly encountered and challenging problem in medical practice. Presentations are variable, and the causal mechanism often remains elusive even after extensive (and often expensive) evaluation. Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to help guide the multidisciplinary approach necessary to diagnose and manage the broad spectrum of patients presenting with syncope. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society, published its first syncope guidelines in 2017. The European Society of Cardiology released the fourth iteration of its syncope guidelines in 2018. This review highlights the differences and congruencies between the 2 sets of recommendations, their implications for clinical practice, the remaining gaps in understanding, and areas of future research. (C) 2019 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available