4.6 Article

Synthesis of Ag-Carbon-TiO2 composite tubes and their antibacterial and organic degradation properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOL-GEL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 291-301

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10971-019-05197-8

Keywords

Carbon doping; PS fiber; TiO2; Ag nanoparticles; Water treatment; Antibacterial property

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131226]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273171, 51673090]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ag-Carbon-TiO2 composite tubes were prepared by using polystyrene/AgNO3 composite fibers as a sacrifice template and a co-pyrolysis process. The Ag-Carbon-TiO2 tubes were characterized by SEM, TEM, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectrum, XPS, and UV-vis spectrum. The results showed that the Ag-Carbon-TiO2 tubes possessed uniform tubular structure with amorphous carbon, graphitic carbon, and Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) distributing uniformly in TiO2. The Ag-Carbon-TiO2 tubes were confirmed high UV-vis light utilization and photocatalytic degradation efficiency to Rhodamine B due to the carbon doping, the surface plasmon resonance of AgNPs and the tubular structure, and the degradation of Rhodamine B reached 90% in 6 h. Meanwhile, they showed an excellent antibacterial effect on staphylococcus aureus, and the fatality rate of Ag-Carbon-TiO2 tubes to staphylococcus aureus reached 99.9% in 24 h when its concentration was higher than 4 mg/ml. The co-pyrolysis process could repress the AgNPs to grow to be large particles, which could be a key for the excellent antibacterial property. The research showed a promising strategy for preparing Ag-Carbon-TiO2 composite tubes by co-pyrolysis of PS composite electrospinning fibers, indicating their potential application in wastewater treatment and antibacterial materials. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available