4.5 Review

Recent advances of application of porous molecular cages for enantioselective recognition and separation

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 134-149

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201900762

Keywords

chiral recognition; enantioselective separation; metal-organic cage; molecular cage; porous organic cage

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21705142, 21675141, 21565032, 21765025]
  2. Applied Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous materials with well-defined pore structures have received considerable attention in the past decades due to their unique structures and wide applications. Most porous materials such as zeolites, metal-organic frameworks, covalent organic frameworks, and porous organic polymers are extended to infinite frameworks or networks by robust covalent or coordination bonds. Porous molecular cages composed of discrete molecules with permanent cavities are an emerging class of porous material and the discrete molecules assemble into solids by weak intermolecular interaction. In comparison to porous extended solids such as metal-organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks, porous molecular cage solids are generally soluble in organic solvents thus allowing solution processing, making them more convenient to apply in many fields. This review mainly focuses on the recent advances of application of porous molecular cages (porous organic cages and metal-organic cages) for enantioselective recognition and separation from 2010 to present, including gas chromatography, capillary electrochromatography, chiral fluorescent recognition, chiral potentiometric sensing, and enantioselective adsorption. Furthermore, the two important family members of porous molecular cages, porous organic cages and metal-organic cages, are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available