4.6 Article

Mental wellbeing among people in prison in Scotland: an analysis of repeat cross-sectional surveys

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages E188-E195

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz106

Keywords

health inequalities; incarceration; mental health; mental wellbeing; prisons

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12017/13, MC_UU_12017/15]
  2. Chief Scientist Office [SPHSU13, SPHSU15]
  3. Chief Scientist Ocffie Clinical Academic Fellowship [CAF/17/11]
  4. MRC [MC_UU_12017/15, MC_UU_12017/13] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that mental wellbeing among people in prison is poor, especially among those who are on remand or have multiple prison episodes. Compared to their peers at liberty, individuals in prison generally have lower levels of mental wellbeing.
Background Mental wellbeing among people in prison is poorly studied, despite featuring in many health and justice policies. We aimed to describe for the first time mental wellbeing among an unselected national prison sample. Methods Since 2013, the Scottish Prisoner Survey-a biennial survey of people in custody in Scotland-has included the Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale (WEMWBS), a 14-item scale with higher scores indicating greater wellbeing. We analysed data from sweeps in 2013 (n = 3158), 2015 (n = 2892) and 2017 (n = 2405) using Student's t-test, ANOVA and multiple linear regression. We also used WEMWBS data from the Scottish Health Survey strati ed by age, gender and deprivation to compare with the population at liberty. Results Mean WEMWBS scores overall were 43.4 in 2013 (SD = 12.2), 41.8 (SD = 11.9) in 2015 and 41.2 (SD = 12.3) in 2017. Mean scores were lower among people on remand and with multiple prison episodes. Age-standardized mean scores were lower among people in prison than their peers at liberty. Conclusions Poor mental wellbeing is an important, under-studied facet of the extreme health inequalities associated with imprisonment. These results identify that people on remand or with multiple episodes are particularly disadvantaged and provide a baseline for monitoring impacts of service or policy interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available