4.8 Article

Al3+ ion intercalation pseudocapacitance study of W18O49 nanostructure

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 438, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227028

Keywords

Intercalation pseudocapacitance; W18O49; Supercapacitors; Charge storage; Al3+ electrolyte

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education Malaysia [RDU170113: FRGS/1/2017/STG07/UMP/01/1]
  2. Universiti Malaysia Pahang [RDU170357]
  3. King Khalid University, the Ministry of Education - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia under research center for advanced material science [RCAMS/KKU/002-18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intercalation pseudocapacitance is of essential significance for designing high performance electrode materials, which offers exceptional charge storage characteristics. In this study, we elucidate the pseudocapacitive behavior of Al3+ ions intercalation within the distinctive tunnels of monoclinic W18O49 nanostructure. 3D sea urchin-like W18O49 is synthesized through one-step solvothermal approach. Its physicochemical properties are investigated by X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Field emission scanning electron microscopy and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area analysis. Cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy techniques are used to investigate the electrochemical characteristics of W18O49 electrode in different electrolyte systems. It shows high specific capacitance of 350 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1), superior electrochemical long-term stability in the Al3+ electrolyte with 92% capacitance retention at 8000 cycles. The excellent electrochemical performance is predominantly due to the Al3+ ions intercalation/deintercalation with W18O49 nanostructure that is proven by ex situ X-ray diffraction analysis. The work marks a notable achievement in the effort of substituting commonly acidic proton electrolyte for W18O49 supercapacitor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available