4.5 Article

Shocking Data on Parcel Shipments of Protein Solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages 690-695

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.10.064

Keywords

antibody; biotechnology; developability; formulation; high concentration; protein formulation; protein structure; protein folding; protein aggregation; physical stability

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [OPP1129749]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1129749] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An early-phase development shipping study was designed to interrogate the stability of liquid formulations under normal shipping conditions. Parcel shipments were made between Seattle, WA, and Indianapolis, IN, during 2018-2019. Each parcel contained a data recorder that tracked the shipment by GPS and measured shock and temperature. During the transport process, the parcels received up to 40 shock events with strengths ranging from 8 to 36G. After shipment, the formulations without polysorbate showed considerable increases in submicron and visible particles while little to no change occurred when polysorbate was present. Samples dropped repeatedly from a height of 18 inches to produce a shock of similar to 25G caused visible particle formation with little increase in the subvisible particles, suggesting that other factors, such as vibration, in addition to the shock, were necessary to produce particle formation. These results provide a basis for further studies in the relationships between physical stability of mAbs and the challenges introduced by the shipment network, specifically shock and vibration. The findings indicate that the shock events as measured are repeatable and attributable to the layout of the sorting facility. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Pharmacists Association (R).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available