4.6 Article

Precise targeting of the globus pallidus internus with quantitative susceptibility mapping for deep brain stimulation surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages 1605-1611

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2019.7.JNS191254

Keywords

deep brain stimulation; quantitative susceptibility mapping; globus pallidus internus; Parkinson's disease; electrode placement; functional neurosurgery; diagnostic technique

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81471387, 81801652]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [17411952700]
  3. Shanghai Sailing Program [18YF1414700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to demonstrate the use of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)-based images to precisely localize the globus pallidus internus (GPi) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) planning and to enhance postsurgical visualization of the DBS lead positions. METHODS: Presurgical T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w), and QSM images as well as postsurgical CT images were obtained in 29 patients with Parkinson's disease. To enhance the contrast within the GP, a hybrid contrast was created by linearly combining T1w and QSM images. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the GPi on T1w, T2w, QSM, and hybrid images were compared. The CNR differences were tested using the 1-way ANOVA method. The visualization of the DBS lead position was demonstrated by merging the postsurgical CT with presurgical MR images. RESULTS: The hybrid images yield the best CNRs for GPi depiction and the visualization of the postsurgical DBS lead position was significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: QSM-based images allow for confident localization of borders of the GPi that is superior to T1w and T2w images. High-contrast hybrid images can be used for precisely directed DBS targeting, e.g., GPi DBS for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available