4.3 Article

FAM20A is essential for amelogenesis, but is dispensable for dentinogenesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR HISTOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 581-591

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10735-019-09851-x

Keywords

Tooth development; Enamel; Dentin; Biomineralization; Cell differentiation; Genetics

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE022549, R01 DE027345] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (US) [DE022549, DE027345] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the gene encoding family with sequence similarity 20, member A (FAM20A) caused amelogenesis imperfecta (AI), in humans. However, the roles of FAM20A in amelogenesis and dentinogenesis are poorly understood. In this study, we generated a Fam20a knockout (Sox2-Cre;Fam20a(fl/fl)) mouse model by crossing Fam20a(fl/fl) mice with Sox2-Cre transgenic mice, in which Fam20a was ablated in both dental epithelium and dental mesenchyme. We found that these mice developed an enamel phenotype that resembles human AI associated with FAM20A mutations, but did not have apparent dentin defects. The secretory stage ameloblasts in the mandibular incisors from the Sox2-Cre;Fam20a(fl/fl) mice were shorter and detached from the enamel matrix, and subsequently lost their polarity, became disorganized and formed numerous spherical extracellular matrices in place of normal enamel. At the molecular level, the Sox2-Cre;Fam20a(fl/fl) mice displayed dramatically reduced expression levels of the genes encoding the enamel matrix proteins, but unaltered levels of the genes encoding the dentin matrix proteins. Moreover, Fam20a ablation resulted in a great decrease in FAM20C protein level, but it did not alter the intracellular localization of FAM20C protein in ameloblasts and odontoblasts. These results indicate that FAM20A is essential for amelogenesis, but is dispensable for dentinogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available