4.5 Article

Differentiating between scavengers and entomopathogenic nematodes: Which is Oscheius chongmingensis?

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVERTEBRATE PATHOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2019.107245

Keywords

Entomopathogenic nematodes; Oscheius; Scavenger; Parasite

Categories

Funding

  1. Nanjing Agricultural University
  2. China Scholarship Council [201606855031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) continue to be explored for their potential usefulness in biological control and pest management programs. As more insect-associated species of nematodes are discovered and described, it is possible that scavengers and kleptoparasites may be mischaracterized as EPNs. If a nematode species is truly an entomopathogen it should display similar infectivity, as well as behaviors and preferences, to those of established EPN species, such as Steinernema carpocapsae. In this study we evaluated dauers of the putative EPN species Oscheius chongmingensis. We examined virulence, odor preferences as a measure of host-seeking behavior, and features of its bacterial symbiont Serratia nematodiphila We determined that O. chongmingensis behaves more like a scavenger than an EPN. Not only did O. chongmingensis exhibit very poor pathogenicity in Galleria mellonella (wax moth larvae), it also displayed odor (host-seeking) preferences that are contrary to the well-known EPN S. carpocapsae. We also found that the bacterial symbiont of O. chongmingensis was antagonistic to S. carpocapsae; S. carpocapsae IJs were unable to develop when S. nematodiphila was a primary food source. We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the characterization of O. chongmingensis as an EPN; and based on the attributes of its preferences for already-infected or deceased hosts, suggest that this nematode is a scavenger, which may be on an evolutionary trajectory leading to an entomopathogenic lifestyle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available