4.2 Article

The predictive value of procalcitonin for early detection of infection in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 343-348

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.10.015

Keywords

Diabetes; Infection; Procalcitonin; ROC curve; Elderly patient

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81770848]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2019J01175]
  3. Young and Middle-aged Talents Training Project of Fujian Provincial Health Commission [2018-ZQN-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Aimed to investigate the predictive value of procalcitonin (PCT) in early detection of infections in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, and to discover the optimum cut-off points of PCT. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with type 2 diabetic patients (>= 65 years) with lung infection (LI), urinary tract infection (UTI) or skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the 3 markers (PCT, WBC count, and CRP) were constructed and compared to assess their accuracies in diagnosing. Results: Among the three different groups with LI, UTI or SSTI, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PCT was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-0.99, p < 0.05) for the LI group, 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99, p < 0.05) for the UTI group, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00, p < 0.05) for the SSTI group. The optimum cutoff point of PCT level was 0.73 ng/mL (Sn 89.7%, Sp 97.7%) for the LI group, 1.48 ng/mL (Sn 88.9%, Sp 100%) for the UTI group, and 0.73 ng/mL (Sn 85.7%, Sp 97.7%) for the SSTI group. Conclusion: PCT demonstrated the strongest correlation with each of the infection types, indicating significant diagnostic value. Optimum cut-off points of PCT levels in elderly diabetes were higher. (c) 2019 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available