4.7 Article

Detrimental effects of SO2 on gaseous mercury(II) adsorption and retention by CaO-based sorbent traps: Competition and heterogeneous reduction

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 387, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121679

Keywords

Hg(II) sampling; SO2 influence; CaO-based trap; Flue gas; DFT

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0201105]
  2. Graduate Student Research and Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_0085]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reliable gaseous Fig(II) measurement is crucial to mercury emissions control from coal-fired flue gas, but Hg(II) sampling under SO2 condition could probably increase the uncertainty of sorbent traps. CaO-AcS synthesized from calcium acetate and porous support were previously demonstrated to be effective for Hg(II) trapping under SO2-free condition. This work further evaluated SO2 influence on its Hg(II) retention ability via integrating experimental and DFT computational studies. Increased breakthrough rate of HgCl2 was found in a two-section CaO-AcS trap under SO2 conditions. Significant basicity and porosity loss of CaO-AcS were attributed to the formation of agglomerate CaSO3. Hg-0 release from CaO-AcS samples suggested potential reactions between Hg (II) and SO2. The detected HgO and Hg2SO4 species by Hg-TPD in CaO-AcS further confirmed this speculation. Moreover, both competition and reduction effects of SO2 on surface-bound Hg(II) species were substantiated by DFT calculations. SO2 showed a stronger interaction with CaO than HgCl2 because SO2 has a lower LUMO level and can accept electrons easier. Reaction pathways indicated Hg(II) was partially reduced to Hg2SO4 under SO2-deficient condition, or directly reduced to Hg under SO2-rich condition. This work fully proposed the SO2 influence mechanisms and improvement countermeasures for practical gaseous Hg(II) sampling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available