4.1 Article

Design, Optimization and Nonlinear Response Control Analysis of the Mega Sub-Controlled Structural System (MSCSS) Under Earthquake Action

Journal

JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S179343112050013X

Keywords

Mega sub-controlled structure system (MSCSS); optimal damper; viscous damper; control effectiveness; response control; rubber bearing; structural optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lately proposed mega sub-controlled structure (MSCSS) remarkably improved the seismic resistance ability and reduced vibration effects much more than the mega substructure (MSS). However, the controlling effectiveness and its optimization remain a significant concern. In this paper, a new configuration of MSCSS is analyzed in which viscous dampers are optimally arranged between mega-frame and substructural frame and optimal damper parameters are investigated. Also, rubber bearings are designed and introduced at the top of the additional column to ease the horizontal constraints between the additional column and mega-floor beam and improve the structural design of MSCSS, so that the structure has a larger span and further reduces the structural response. The result showed that optimal parameters of the damper and its optimal arrangement have a significant influence in the control effectiveness of MSCSS. Furthermore, the addition of a rubber bearing at the top of the additional column improves the mechanical behavior of the column and further reduces the acceleration response of both the mega-frame structure and the substructure. This paper also shows that the percentage reduction of the acceleration is more within the substructure than at the mega-frame structure. The seismic response of this structure under El Centro is less than the Taft (NE) wave and the percentage reduction is more under the Taft wave than under the El Centro wave.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available