4.7 Article

Absolute Improvements in Freedom From Distant Recurrence to Tailor Adjuvant Endocrine Therapies for Premenopausal Women: Results From TEXT and SOFT

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 1293-+

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.01967

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. International Breast Cancer Study Group
  3. US National Cancer Institute
  4. Breast Cancer Research Foundation [16-185, 17-187, 18-003]
  5. Susan G. Komen for the Cure Promise [KG080081]
  6. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  7. US National Cancer Institute [CA075362]
  8. Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation
  9. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research
  10. Cancer Research Switzerland
  11. Oncosuisse
  12. Cancer League Switzerland
  13. Foundation for Clinical Cancer Research of Eastern Switzerland
  14. Breast Cancer Trials Australia & New Zealand (National Health and Medical Research Council) [351161, 510788, 1105058]
  15. Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit on behalf of the National Cancer Research Institute Breast Clinical Studies Group United Kingdom (Cancer Research UK) [CRUKE/03/022, CRUKE/03/023]
  16. Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit on behalf of the National Cancer Research Institute Breast Clinical Studies Group United Kingdom (National Institute for Health Research Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research Biomedical [A15955]
  17. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (US National Institutes of Health [NIH]) [CA180821]
  18. SWOG (US NIH grant) [CA32102]
  19. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group (US NI) [CA21115, CA16116]
  20. NRG Oncology (US NIH) [U10CA180868, U10CA180822, UG1CA189867]
  21. Canadian Cancer Trials Group (US NIH) [CA077202]
  22. Canadian Cancer Trials Group (Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute grants) [015469, 021039]
  23. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1105058] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSEThe Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (TEXT)/Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) showed superior outcomes for premenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant exemestane plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) or tamoxifen plus OFS versus tamoxifen alone. We previously reported the magnitude of absolute improvements in freedom from any recurrence across a continuous, composite measure of recurrence risk to tailor decision making. With longer follow-up, we now focus on distant recurrence.METHODSThe TEXT/SOFT HR-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative analysis population included 4,891 women stratified by predetermined chemotherapy use. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 8-year freedom from distant recurrence were analyzed using subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) methodology across subpopulations defined by the continuous composite measure of recurrence risk. For each patient, the composite risk value was obtained from a Cox model that incorporated age; nodal status; tumor size; grade; and estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki-67 labeling index expression levels.RESULTSThe overall rate of 8-year freedom from distant recurrence was 91.1% and ranged from approximately 100% to 63% across lowest to highest composite risks. TEXT patients who received chemotherapy had an average absolute improvement with exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen plus OFS of 5.1%, and STEPP analysis showed improvements from less than 1% to more than 15% from lowest to highest composite risks. SOFT patients who remained premenopausal after chemotherapy had an average 5.2% absolute improvement with exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen and reached 10% across composite risks; for tamoxifen plus OFS versus tamoxifen, the maximum improvement was approximately 3.5%. Women who did not receive chemotherapy had a more than 97% rate of 8-year freedom from distant recurrence, and improvements with exemestane plus OFS ranged from 1% to 4%.CONCLUSIONPremenopausal women with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer and high recurrence risk, as defined by clinicopathologic characteristics, may experience a 10% to 15% absolute improvement in 8-year freedom from distant recurrence with exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen plus OFS or tamoxifen alone. The potential benefit of escalating endocrine therapy versus tamoxifen alone is minimal for those at low recurrence risk. (c) 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available