Journal
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 248, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119301
Keywords
Maximum power point tracking; Thermoelectric generation system; Heterogeneous temperature difference; Fast atom search optimization
Categories
Funding
- Research and Development Start-Up Foundation of Shantou University [NTF19001]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [61963020, 51907112, 51777078, 51977102]
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [D2172920]
- Key Projects of Basic Research and Applied Basic Research in Universities of Guangdong Province [2018KZDXM001]
- Science and Technology Projects of China Southern Power Grid [GDKJXM20172831]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper designs a novel maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique for centralized thermoelectric generation (TEG) system under heterogeneous temperature difference (HeTD). Since the HeTD can result in multiple local maximum power points (LMPPs) for centralized TEG system, a fast atom search optimization (FASO) is designed to approximate the global maximum power point (GMPP) from multiple LMPPs. In order to accelerate the convergence for a high quality solution, the Euclidian distance ratio of the original atom search optimization (ASO) is employed to adaptively update according to the dynamic optimization results, as well as for the number of neighbours for each atom. Through case studies such as start-up test, step variation of temperature, stochastic temperature change, and analyse of sensitivity are carried out, in which the practicability and superiority of FASO are compared with that of MPPT method based on a single LMPP and four meta-heuristic algorithms. Simulation results show that the energy output produced by FASO ranges from 101.64% to 451.49% to the alternatives. Finally, through hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) experiment based on a dSpace, the feasibility of the hardware realization is confirmed, in which the difference between simulation results and HIL experiment results is less than 2.3%. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available