4.7 Article

Challenges towards carbon dioxide emissions peak under in-depth socioeconomic transition in China: Insights from Shanghai

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 247, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119083

Keywords

CO2 emissions; Peaking target; Socioeconomic transition; China; Input-output analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71704012]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0503005]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chinese government committed to peak its CO2 emissions before 2030, while managing its in-depth socioeconomic transition to a slower but more balanced growth. Features of such a transition include rising high-tech manufacturing and services as well as fast-growing household consumption, which both have implications for China's CO2 emissions peak. In this study, we focus on analyzing the case of Shanghai, a leading city in China, for its experience of realizing CO2 emission stagnation during in-depth socioeconomic transition process. We find that emerging high-tech manufacturing and services in Shanghai, although to some extent having replaced carbon-intensive heavy industries, have generated additional CO2 emissions of respectively 364.7 Mt and 308.6 Mt, mainly through their supply chains during the 2007-2012 time period. We also find that soaring urban household consumption induced huge CO2 emissions, including 251.0 Mt embodied emissions in producing goods and services for urban residents, and additional CO2 emissions associated with massive investment in urban infrastructure and buildings from 2007 to 2012. The challenges we identified from Shanghai's real case provide useful insights for China to peak its CO2 emissions under its in-depth socioeconomic transition. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available