4.7 Review

Greenhouse gas measurement from Chinese freshwater bodies: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 233, Issue -, Pages 368-378

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.052

Keywords

Green house gas (GHG); Freshwater; Lake; Emission; Reservoir; River

Funding

  1. Hohai University
  2. Foreign Affair Service [WQ20180053]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51879068, 41561134016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Freshwater bodies are found as significant sources of greenhouse gas to the atmosphere, but their quantitative significance is not yet clear. The rapid increase in hydropower dams and associated emissions has received much attention from hydropower industries, environmentalists, and policymakers from across the globe. The tropical subtropical eco-regions are, particularly, considered as hotspots from greenhouse gas production point of view as the emitted gases are playing a critical role in climate change. The present paper reviews the uncertainty and limitations of greenhouse gas measurement from Chinese freshwater bodies based on available data. Literature reported that carbon dioxide emission from Chinese lakes falls in the range of 0.01-2.16 mu mol m(-2)s(-1) except for Poyang Lake. The CO2 emission from Chinese hydropower reservoirs is estimated as 0.15-1.11, while for rivers, it is 0.44-4.12 mu mol m(-2)s(-1) The methane and nitrous oxide emissions are, however, found less than carbon dioxide emission. The CO2 emission falls in the range of -0.17-0.54 and 1.08-1.70, respectively higher than global lakes and rivers, while the global reservoirs have emission in the range of -0.17-2.98 mu mol m(-2)s(-1). The paper also reports the challenges in the estimation and prediction of greenhouse gas emissions from hydropower reservoirs along with suggested mitigation measures. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available