4.6 Article

Neurovascular coupling preserved in a chronic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: Methodology is critical

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 40, Issue 11, Pages 2289-2303

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X19890830

Keywords

Barrel cortex; electrophysiology; optical imaging; blood flow; J20

Funding

  1. Alzheimer's Research UK [ARUK-IRG2014]
  2. Medical Research Council UK [MR/M013553/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Royal Society [105586/Z/14/Z]
  5. MRC [MR/M013553/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impaired neurovascular coupling has been suggested as an early pathogenic factor in Alzheimer's disease (AD), which could serve as an early biomarker of cerebral pathology. We have established an anaesthetic regime to allow repeated measurements of neurovascular function over three months in the J20 mouse model of AD (J20-AD) and wild-type (WT) controls. Animals were 9-12 months old at the start of the experiment. Mice were chronically prepared with a cranial window through which 2-Dimensional optical imaging spectroscopy (2D-OIS) was used to generate functional maps of the cerebral blood volume and saturation changes evoked by whisker stimulation and vascular reactivity challenges. Unexpectedly, the hemodynamic responses were largely preserved in the J20-AD group. This result failed to confirm previous investigations using the J20-AD model. However, a final acute electrophysiology and 2D-OIS experiment was performed to measure both neural and hemodynamic responses concurrently. In this experiment, previously reported deficits in neurovascular coupling in the J20-AD model were observed. This suggests that J20-AD mice may be more susceptible to the physiologically stressing conditions of an acute experimental procedure compared to WT animals. These results therefore highlight the importance of experimental procedure when determining the characteristics of animal models of human disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available