4.3 Article

Cyclophilin A as a biomarker for the therapeutic effect of balloon angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages 415-423

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.09.010

Keywords

Brain natriuretic peptide; Hemodynamics; Pulmonary circulation; Pulmonary thromboembolism

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan [15H02535, 15H04816, 15K15046]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan [10102895]
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Tokyo, Japan [15ak0101035h0001, 16ek0109176h0001, 17ek0109227h0001]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04816, 15H02535, 15K15046] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although cardiac troponin and natriuretic peptide have been shown to decrease after balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) with improved right ventricular afterload in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), biomarkers to evaluate the effects of BPA independently of heart failure status remain to be developed. Methods: In 39 consecutive CTEPH patients including 31 who underwent BPA, we measured plasma levels of cyclophilin A (CyPA), which we demonstrated is secreted from pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cells in response to mechanical stretch and hypoxia. Results: CyPA levels were elevated in CTEPH patients (12.7, IQR: 7.6-16.0) compared with 8 thromboembolic controls with a history of venous thromboembolism (4.9, IQR: 2.4-11.2) or 18 healthy controls (4.1, IQR: 2.4-6.8) (both p < 0.05) and were linearly correlated with mean pulmonary arterial pressure (r = 0.50, p = 0.0003) and pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.32, p = 0.026). BPA reduced CyPA levels and tended to lower brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (p < 0.01 and p = 0.07). When comparing the changes in CyPA before and after BPA in the two subgroups with higher (>= 35 pg/mL) and normal (<35 pg/mL) BNP at baseline, CyPA decreased both in patients with higher BNP and those with normal BNP (both p < 0.05). In contrast, BNP decreased only in patients with higher BNP (p < 0.05). Also, CyPA decreased both in patients with lower (<25 kg/m(2)) and higher (>= 25 kg/m(2)) body mass index (BMI) at baseline (both p < 0.05), whereas BPA tended to reduce BNP in patients with lower BMI (p = 0.12) but not in those with higher BMI (p = 0.55). Conclusions: CyPA could be a useful biomarker to evaluate the effects of BPA even in patients with normal BNP or high BMI. (C) 2019 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available