4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Which is the best-suited landmark to assess the thoracic orientation?

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109545

Keywords

Thorax; Intra-thoracic motion; Motion capture; Measuring devices; Measurement errors; Spinal kinematics; Back measurements

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Bonn, Germany (MEDITHENA)
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201708080090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several skin surface-based techniques exist to non-invasively determine the spinal kinematics. However, the accuracy of these techniques is limited by soft-tissue artefacts. Furthermore, structures like the thorax are frequently assumed to be rigid but display considerable mobility within itself. This study aimed to quantify the accuracy at different thoracic landmarks for measuring mobility in healthy individuals during different activities to provide a recommendation for the best suited measurement location. The locations of 29 landmarks were continuously captured on 19 individuals (age: 25-59 years) during sitting, standing, walking, jumping, intra-thoracic motions, and different breathing depths using reflective markers. Marker triplets were used at every landmark to calculate their orientations by first backtracking the rigid-body motion (RBM) of the thorax in general, and subsequently calculating the RBM of each rigid marker triplet. Of the latter, the maximum axis angle for each exercise was statistically evaluated. Landmarks at the middle of the clavicles displayed the largest overall errors (approximately 90 degrees during worst case scenario). However, the variability of errors among the investigated exercises was large. Landmarks at the cranial sternal region (particularly at the Louis angle) and at the T3 spinous process showed the smallest errors for all subjects and tasks (e.g., <5 degrees and <11 degrees, respectively, during normal breathing). When only one sensor is to be used, it is recommended to use the cranial sternal region to assess the thoracic orientation. Study results highly sensitive to thoracic orientation should be considered with care or performed using more appropriate methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available