4.5 Article

A Generalized Abundance Index for Seasonal Invertebrates

Journal

BIOMETRICS
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 1305-1314

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/biom.12506

Keywords

Butterflies; Citizen science; Concentrated likelihood; Normal mixtures; Phenology; UKBMS

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/1000917/1, EP/P505577/1]
  2. Countryside Council for Wales
  3. Defra
  4. Joint Nature Conservation Committee
  5. Forestry Commission
  6. Natural England
  7. Natural Environment Research Council
  8. Northern Ireland Environment Agency
  9. Scottish Natural Heritage
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

At a time of climate change and major loss of biodiversity, it is important to have efficient tools for monitoring populations. In this context, animal abundance indices play an important role. In producing indices for invertebrates, it is important to account for variation in counts within seasons. Two new methods for describing seasonal variation in invertebrate counts have recently been proposed; one is nonparametric, using generalized additive models, and the other is parametric, based on stopover models. We present a novel generalized abundance index which encompasses both parametric and nonparametric approaches. It is extremely efficient to compute this index due to the use of concentrated likelihood techniques. This has particular relevance for the analysis of data from long-term extensive monitoring schemes with records for many species and sites, for which existing modeling techniques can be prohibitively time consuming. Performance of the index is demonstrated by several applications to UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme data. We demonstrate the potential for new insights into both phenology and spatial variation in seasonal patterns from parametric modeling and the incorporation of covariate dependence, which is relevant for both monitoring and conservation. Associated R code is available on the journal website.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available