4.5 Article

Awareness of Self and Disease Assessment: Development and Validation of a Subjective Measure in People with Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages 841-850

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-190371

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; anosognosia; awareness; self; self-assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. LABEX (excellence laboratory, program investment for the future) DISTALZ (Development of Innovative Strategies for a Transdisciplinary Approach to Alzheimer's disease)
  2. regional council of Hauts-de-France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: People with Alzheimer's disease (PwAD) remain able to speak coherently about their daily life for a long time, and their level of awareness could be determined through their discourse. In a grounded-theory approach, awareness of self and awareness of disease are intertwined and can be observed through three domains: mechanisms, objects and modes of expression. Objective: Based on preliminary results, in this article, we present the ASDA (Awareness of Self and Disease Assessment), a new subjective measurement tool for awareness in PwAD. To consider its use in research and practice, we initially performed validation analyses, including internal consistency, test-retest reliability and interrater reliability analyses. Methods: The new assessment tool consists of a semi-structured interview and ratings of 22 items divided into three categories. As part of our observational study, we assessed a sample of 28 PwAD who participated in four interviews (one every two weeks). Results: The ASDA shows good homogeneity within the domains of awareness and a certain degree of stability between two measurement times and between investigators. Missing values in the results provided information regarding awareness levels within and across the subjects. Conclusion: The results suggest that awareness could be assessed through subjective experience without reference to a comparison.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available