4.7 Article

Hot workability of FeMnSiCrNi shape memory alloy based on processing map and martensitic transformation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 806, Issue -, Pages 1153-1165

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.316

Keywords

Metals and alloys; Shape memory alloy; Phase transitions; Processing map; Microstructures

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475101, 51871070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hot workability of Fe66Mn15Si5Cr9Ni5 (wt.%) shape memory alloy (SMA) with gamma austenite and epsilon martensite at room temperature was investigated by establishing processing map and simultaneously considering martensitic transformation. All the FeMnSiCrNi samples subjected to hot deformation are composed of e martensite and g austenite. Furthermore, the higher temperature results in the larger fraction of e martensite, whereas the higher strain rate leads to the smaller fraction of e martensite. Simultaneously, the higher temperature or the lower strain rate leads to the larger grain size. In addition, dislocations, stacking faults and austenite twins appear in the deformed samples. According to processing map, the optimal hot processing parameters for the FeMnSiCrNi SMA is determined as the temperature range of 850-925 degrees C at the strain rate below 0.0008 s(-1) and the temperature range of 925-1000 degrees C at the strain rate range of 0.001-0.03 s(-1). Furthermore, the existence of e martensite in the deformed FeMnSiCrNi samples has an adverse effect on shape memory effect of FeMnSiCrNi SMA. In addition, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) and subsequent martensitic transformation weaken the textures of the grains with g austenite phase in the deformed FeMnSiCrNi SMA samples. Therefore, it is necessary to prevent FeMnSiCrNi SMA from being subjected to hot workability in the case of too high temperatures or too low strain rates. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available