4.7 Article

Citraconic anhydride as an electrolyte additive to improve the high temperature performance of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2/graphite pouch batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 805, Issue -, Pages 757-766

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.140

Keywords

Citraconic anhydride; High temperature; Electrolyte additive; Graphite interfacial layer; LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2/graphite pouch cell

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC51621001, 51771075, 51571091]
  2. Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou [201604016131]
  3. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An unstable solid electrolyte interface (SEI) on graphite electrode surface is easily destroyed and continually consumes the electrolyte for reconstruction, resulting in large capacity loss under high temperature operation. Here, citraconic anhydride (CAn) as a novel electrolyte additive is evaluated to overcome the aforementioned high temperature problems of the LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2/graphite pouch cell. The cell containing 2 wt% CAn displays a superior capacity recovery capability and negligible capacity loss after storage at 60 degrees C for 15 days. Electrochemical measurements and spectroscopic techniques confirm that a high stability SEI film is formed on the graphite surface by the CAn reduction. Moreover, the CAn-derived SEI film can significantly reduce the irreversible consumption of LiPF6 and then effectively improve the high temperature performances of pouch LIBs. Differently from other additives, a certain amount of CAn component can reduce the impedance of pouch cells during high temperature storage process. These findings offer a promising high temperature additive for high-energy density commercial pouch LIBs. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available