4.7 Review

Tuning the work function of graphene toward application as anode and cathode

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 805, Issue -, Pages 1117-1134

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.187

Keywords

Graphene; Work function; Kelvin probe force microscopy; Ultra-violet photoelectron spectroscopy; Thermionic emission; Cathode; Anode

Funding

  1. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades of Spain) (AEI) [ESP2017-82092-ERC]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid (Spain) [2018/T2IND/11352]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades of Spain [RYC-2014-15357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid technological progress in the 21st century demands new multi-functional materials applicable to a wide variety of industries. Two-dimensional (2D) materials are predicted to have a revolutionary impact on the cost, size, weight, and functions of future electronic and optoelectronic devices. Graphene, which shows potential as an alternative to conventional conductive transparent metal oxides, may play a central role. Since its work function (WF) is tunable, graphene exhibits the interesting ability to serve two different roles in electronic and optoelectronic devices, both as an anode and a cathode. After introducing some basic concepts, this work reviews the most important advances in controlling the tuned WF of graphene, highlighting special features of graphene electronic band structure and recognizing different methods for measuring WF. The impact of thickness, type of contact, chemical doping, UV and plasma treatments, defects, and functional groups of graphene oxide are considered and related with the applications of the modulated material. The results of the review, organized in lookup tables, have been used to identify the advantages and main challenges of the tuning methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available